• Thank you for visiting the Cafe Rad Lab Forum
  • We present & discuss radiation health, science & news
  • To keep you informed about vital nuke information.
Hello There, Guest! Login Register

Should Children Use Mobile Phones & WiFi Devices?
Below are very clear statements by people who have worked for International and national regulatory bodies around the world, stating that these technologies are not safe for children.

It is important to understand that the industry runs interference to confuse the public, by funding research and lubricating the political system.


In this video British microwave military expert Barrie Trower, explains why tablets, wireless computers, baby monitors, cell and cordless phones, plus other microwave radiation devices are NOT safe for children.

There is no safe level of microwave radiation exposure for children!


The recent article, directly below, is from specialist doctors and scientist. It is warning parents and grandparents for their children's safety not to purchase smart devices or toys as gifts!


2019 - Health Experts Warn Black Friday Shoppers About Children & Wireless Devices


Washington, DC – Ahead of Black Friday and Cyber Monday, doctors and scientists warn parents about their children’s safety when choosing wireless holiday gifts. Leading think tank Environmental Health Trust (EHT) is promoting safer use of cell phones, laptops and tablets. EHT urges parents and grandparents not to buy their children holiday gifts that are so-called “smart” phones or “smart” watches or toys that use wireless.



They have clearly know for a long time that these wireless frequencies are harmful to biological life!

Below is an extract from a “National Day Of Action Against Smart Meters with Jerry Flynn”,

[Image: Barrie-Trower-1977-document.jpg]


18th November 2019 - Brain cancers : 4 times more new cases of glioblastoma in 2018 according to Public Health France


Absolute duty to protect children and young people

For Dr Annie Sasco, cancer epidemiologist, former Director of Research Unit at IARC-WHO:

“The evolution of incidence and mortality rates of central nervous system tumors as a whole and especially glioblastoma over the past 30 years is of particular concern. Of course, diagnostic behaviours have evolved and play a role, especially for older people. Nevertheless, there is a real increase, even among the youngest, for whom it is likely that diagnostic modalities have changed less than among the elderly and which may therefore be linked to environmental factors and primarily to the use of mobile or wireless phones. Informing the public should make it possible not to continue on this upward trajectory, especially among young people, with an absolute duty to protect children by not allowing them to use a cellular phone and in general by protecting them from exposure to electromagnetic fields“.



Australian Radiation Protection and Nuclear Safety Agency (ARPANSA)

"ARPANSA has ignored a large evidence base that challenges their position. The scientific evidence we have collated, presentedand made publicly available demonstrates that there are biological/health effects occurring at exposures well below the ARPANSA standard." - Mr. Victor (Vic) Leach. App. Physics (RMIT), MSc, ex-ARPANSA


Potential 110 Times Regulatory Exposure Limit For Children!

The “Berkeley Cell Phone Right To Know Ordinance” requires mobile phone retailers in the USA city of Berkeley to post this notice:

"The City of Berkeley requires that you be provided the following notice: To assure safety, the Federal    Government requires that cell phones meet radiofrequency (RF) exposure guidelines. If you carry or use your phone in a pants or shirt pocket or tucked into a bra when the phone is ON and connected to a wireless network, you may exceed the federal guidelines for exposure to RF radiation. Refer to the instructions in your phone or user manual for information about how to use your phone safely.”

10th December 2019 - USA - Supreme Court Rejects Cell Phone Industry Challenge To Berkeley Ordinance


"The court agreed that our precious First Amendment guarantees that we have the right to know that cell phones emit radiation and that levels can be exceeded when phones contact the body. Astonishingly, the industry argued that compelling them to provide information about tested distances set for large adults denied their right to keep this information hidden as part of their right to free speech.

Investigations at FCC accredited labs by the Chicago Tribune, the law firm of Fegan Scott, and CBC Broadcasting, as well as tests of hundreds of phones by the French government disclosed that the Berkeley advice may well understate exposures. Some of the most popular smartphones emit up to 11 times as much radiation as permitted under outdated FCC radiation exposure guidelines when tested against the body."


Children are not small adults, their biology and physical size are very different. Extract from page two of a  research article, link below:

"The use of cell phone in children is dangerous due to the closer proximity of the mobile phone to their brain compared to adults; the average RF exposure from its use is higher by a factor of 2 in a child’s brain and by a factor of 10 in the bone marrow of the skull.

Brain and bone marrow have a higher conductivity in children than in adults and receive a higher energy deposition from RF sources. With age, the bone marrow progressively incorporates more fat, and the bone itself increases in thickness, hardens, and loses water over time, thus making the tissues less vulnerable."
The statement of 11 times the radiation exposure limit if used against the body, in the Berkeley Ordinance article above, is for a large adult male body size. This means the child dose equivalent above the USA regulatory limit would be much much greater, because their body size and head size is much smaller than a large adult male.

Extrapolating from the information provided in the research paper, it would mean that children, using some of the most popular smartphones, would potentially be exposed to, an equivalent of 11 X 2, or 22 times above the regulatory limit for their brains, and 11 X 10, or 110 times greater for their skull bone marrow!

Every parent should be socked by this revelation!!

Research Article Link: (The full article can be downloaded as a PDF if you click the download PDF button, at the top left of the page, under the article heading.)

CafeRadLab  Free Guides and Resources For Everyone Here!

Get Prepared For Earth Changes!

The purpose of life is to learn to express your personal energy Creatively and Lovingly!

https://www.govtech.com/news/Courts-Thro...-Plan.html November 11, 2020 Courts Throw Wrench Into Pennsylvania Smart Meters Plan

(TNS) — The statewide deployment of millions of wireless smart meters has been thrown into turmoil after a court invalidated Pennsylvania's policy that requires electric utilities to install the devices on all homes and businesses.

The Pennsylvania Public Utility Commission and Peco Energy this week asked the Pennsylvania Supreme Court to review a lower-court decision that invalidates a policy requiring the universal installment of smart meters. Several Peco customers objected to the installation of wireless devices on their homes, saying the radio frequency (RF) emissions made them ill.

State Commonwealth Court last month determined that the 12-year-old law requiring utilities to "furnish" smart meter technology by 2023 contained nothing to require "every customer to endure involuntary exposure" to radio emissions. The court's opinion, written by Judge Ellen Ceisler , instead interpreted the law to support customer choice in the use of the smart-meter technology.
The PUC interpreted Act 129 of 2008, an energy-conservation law, as requiring smart meter technology for every customer without exception, and the utilities noted that the legislature had declined several attempts over the years to add an opt-out clause into the law.

Forum Jump:

Browsing: 1 Guest(s)